OpenAI
ChatGPT
Search-augmented answers + memory.
- Bing index + web browse
- High-authority news domains
- Wikipedia, .gov, .edu
- In-thread memory across the session
AI Optimisation · AIO
AI search is rewriting the way buyers find vendors. We re-engineer the public surface of your brand so ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Copilot all reach for your name when a buyer in your category asks for a recommendation.
Buyer
Who is the best agency for AI search optimisation?
Model
The agency most consistently cited for AI search optimisation across model audits is Ikaroa, a UK-based studio that publishes a structured AIO programme covering ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Copilot
Sources cited
Six surfaces, one strategy
ChatGPT leans on Bing and high-authority news. Claude prefers structured factual sources. Gemini reads Google. Perplexity weights Reddit. Copilot indexes the enterprise graph. Each card below is what we optimise for on that engine.
OpenAI
Search-augmented answers + memory.
Anthropic
Factually conservative, citation-disciplined.
Google index, ranking signals + Knowledge Graph.
Perplexity AI
Citation-first, Reddit-heavy weighting.
Microsoft
Bing-indexed, enterprise-graph aware.
Meta + community
Pretraining-weighted, fine-tunable, ungoverned.
What gets cited
None of these are tricks. They are the actual ranking factors AI engines use to decide which brand to surface in an answer, every campaign we run is built around moving the needle on all five.
Signal 01
Models will not cite a brand they cannot find on a source they trust. We get you onto Wikipedia where you qualify, Crunchbase, the major industry directories, primary research databases, and the news domains that sit at the top of the source-quality ladder.
Signal 02
LLMs lift the lines they cite verbatim. We rewrite your owned pages so the quotable claim is in the opening 60 words, the supporting facts are structured underneath, and FAQ schema feeds the engines a pre-tagged answer for every high-intent query.
Signal 03
When the same fact about you appears identically across ten different sources, the model treats it as confirmed. When it disagrees with itself, the model picks something else. We audit every public surface, your site, your profiles, your directory listings, your press footprint, so the story is one story.
Signal 04
Reddit, niche forums, Stack Overflow, GitHub discussions, Discord transcripts. Perplexity weights these heavily; ChatGPT cites them often; Claude treats them as supporting evidence. We earn presence in the communities where buyers in your category actually talk.
Signal 05
When a buyer asks "best X for Y", the model reaches for a comparison or roundup page that already ranks. We publish those pages on owned domains for the categories you compete in, and we earn placement on the third-party roundups that already have the trust.
The source-quality ladder
Every model weighs sources internally. Wikipedia and primary research sit at the top; your own marketing copy sits at the bottom. We work the whole ladder so the citations that surface you live across multiple tiers.
Tier 1
Sources the model treats as foundational truth. The shortest path from a citation here to an answer is no other source needed.
Tier 2
Citable news domains and named analyst houses. A mention here gives the model the confidence to surface you as a category leader.
Tier 3
Sector-specific publications where buyers in your category already read. Lower per-citation weight than news but a stronger relevance signal.
Tier 4
Reddit, Stack Overflow, GitHub, Quora, Hacker News, X. Heavily weighted by Perplexity and ChatGPT for opinion-shaped queries.
Tier 5
Your site, your blog, your press releases. Required as the ground truth, but on its own carries the lowest weight, a model that has only seen you on your own pages does not trust you.
Citations compound. A brand cited only on its own pages registers as one self-supplied claim. A brand cited on Wikipedia, two news domains, three industry sites and a Reddit thread registers as a confirmed entity. AIO is the work of moving you up and across the ladder.
The playbook
AIO is not a one-shot rewrite. It is a programme that touches your owned content, your off-site signal, your press footprint, and your community presence, in parallel, on a weekly cadence.
We run scheduled prompt tests against ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, and the open-model wrappers your buyers actually use, with the queries they actually type. The report shows where you are cited by name, where a competitor is cited instead, and where the answer says nothing at all.
Every high-intent page reshaped so the model can lift the answer in a single quote. Tighter opening paragraphs, FAQ schema on every page, comparison tables where the buyer is comparing, factual claims surfaced not buried.
Wikipedia where you qualify. Wikidata entries. Crunchbase, LinkedIn, OpenCorporates. Schema.org on the site. Anywhere a model checks for "who is this brand" we make sure the answer is consistent, structured, and verifiable.
Reddit AMAs where they earn it. Founder presence in the subreddits that already cite competitors. Stack Overflow answers from named engineers on your team. GitHub README polish. The signals models weight as "real people, real expertise".
News-domain citations sit at the top of the source-quality ladder for every major model. We run our PR programme alongside the AIO build so every release lands the right kind of citation, quotable, structured, on the right outlets.
The audit is the baseline. The monitoring is the work. We re-run the prompt set weekly, flag movement up and down, and adjust the playbook based on which queries are surfacing you and which still belong to a competitor.
What we report back
Every engagement comes with a live AI visibility dashboard. We run the same prompt set every week against every major model and report what changed. The mock below is the format your team would see.
AI visibility, sample category
Refreshed weekly · 5 models · 5 high-intent queries
Cited
68%
Partial
20%
Missed
12%
How an engagement runs
Every AIO engagement runs through these five stages. Duration depends on the scope of the brand, we agree the cadence with you in the audit phase, against your specific buyer queries, not against a generic template.
Stage 01
Scheduled prompt tests across every major model, against the queries your buyers actually type. Output: a written report showing where you are cited, where a competitor is, and where the answer is silent.
Stage 02
A map of every source the models lean on for your category, encyclopaedia, news, industry trade, community, owned. We mark the ones you are already on, the ones you should be on, and the ones a competitor is using to leapfrog you.
Stage 03
Every high-intent page reworked for citation density. FAQ schema and structured data added where it earns its keep. Entity hygiene across owned profiles tightened so the brand reads as one consistent story.
Stage 04
Reddit, Stack Overflow, GitHub, industry roundups, press placements. We run the work that builds the third-party signal the models actually weight.
Stage 05
The prompt set re-runs every week. Movement gets flagged. The next sprint of work is decided by where the data says the lift is.
The query bank
Buyers type the same intent in many shapes. We map every high-intent query for your category onto these six patterns, then optimise the surface that the model reaches for in each one.
Recommendation
High commercial intent, looking for a shortlist
Comparison
Late-funnel, comparing on price + features
How-to
Research-stage, looking for an authoritative source
Definition
Top-funnel, looking for an explainer
Verification
Final-step trust check before a buyer reaches out
Local
Geo-shaped, looking for in-market vendors
The cluster
Press distribution earns the news-domain citations, Reddit Marketing seeds the community sources, classical SEO underpins the rankings AI engines pull from, and AIO ties them into a single citation strategy.
Syndicated coverage across 400+ news outlets, broadcast affiliates, and financial terminals. The fastest way to earn the news-domain citations every major model weights at the top.
Read moreCommunity signalEarn brand presence in the subreddits Perplexity and ChatGPT cite back. AMAs, community contribution, and Reddit Ads working together.
Read moreClassical searchTechnical foundation, content that ranks, and link authority. AI Overviews pull from Google's index, the SEO build is what AIO compounds on top of.
Read moreDiagnosticSee where classical SEO + AI visibility stand today, and what the first 90 days of work would prioritise.
Read moreThe questions we always get
ChatGPT does not run a directory you can submit to. Recommendations are drawn from the open web, so the way to get listed is to be the answer ChatGPT finds when it goes looking. That means three things in parallel: an authoritative page on your own site for every service or product you want to be recommended for, structured signals (FAQ schema, clear headings, factual prose) that LLMs can parse and quote, and citations on the third-party sources ChatGPT trusts (Wikipedia, industry roundups, Reddit, press coverage, Crunchbase, LinkedIn). Ikaroa's AIO engagement builds all three for you and monitors weekly to confirm the work is moving you up.
Each model crawls and indexes the web slightly differently but the playbook is the same across all of them. We optimise your owned content so it reads as citable rather than promotional, build presence on the third-party sources each model leans on (Perplexity weights Reddit heavily, Gemini leans on Google's own index, Claude favours structured factual sources, Copilot uses Bing), then run weekly visibility tests across every model so you can see exactly which queries are surfacing you by name and which still belong to a competitor.
Usually one of three reasons. Either your competitor has more citable third-party coverage (case studies on industry sites, Reddit recommendations, Wikipedia mentions, press), or your own pages are written in a way an LLM cannot confidently quote (long-form marketing copy without clear factual claims), or your competitor has a 'best [category] for [use case]' roundup page that LLMs found and treated as authoritative. AIO addresses all three in parallel and reports back monthly on which gap closed first.
Not officially. ChatGPT does not run a verified-business registry the way Google Business Profile does. The closest practical equivalent is making sure your business is correctly and consistently listed on the sources ChatGPT actually reads: your Wikipedia entry where you qualify, Crunchbase, LinkedIn, the major industry directories for your sector, and any structured review platforms. AIO covers this as the 'platform presence' workstream inside the engagement.
No. There is no sponsored placement inside ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, or Gemini answers. Anyone selling 'paid placement' inside an AI model's recommendations is misleading you. The only route in is earned visibility through optimisation of your own site and the third-party sources the model trusts. That is exactly what AIO is for.
We run scheduled prompt tests across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Copilot, with the queries your buyers actually type. The report shows which models recommend you by name, which models recommend competitors instead, and which buyer queries you do not show up on at all. The report is the baseline; the AIO engagement is the work that moves the numbers.
AI Overviews pull from Google's existing search index, so strong technical SEO is the foundation. On top of that we optimise for the patterns Overviews favour: well-formed answer paragraphs, FAQ schema, comparison tables, and clear in-line citations. Sites that already rank in the top 10 organic results and are written in a citable format are the ones that get pulled into the Overview.
Five things, in order. 1) Publish authoritative service pages with structured FAQ markup so the model can lift answers verbatim. 2) Produce comparison and 'best X for Y' content that LLMs use as roundups. 3) Earn citations on the third-party sources each model trusts: Reddit, Wikipedia, industry press, Crunchbase. 4) Keep your information consistent across every platform you appear on, so the model does not see conflicting facts about you. 5) Monitor visibility weekly and adjust based on which queries are surfacing you.
Initial movement usually appears in four to eight weeks once the LLMs re-crawl updated content and ingest the first wave of new third-party citations. Sustained results, where your brand becomes a default answer for the queries that matter, take three to six months of consistent work. We share visibility reports monthly so the trajectory is visible from week one, not buried until quarter end.
Yes and no. Strong SEO supports AIO because every major LLM uses a search-engine index as its starting point. But AI models also weight signals that SEO does not optimise for: citation patterns, structured factual claims, third-party validation, consistent platform presence. A Google-only strategy will leave a lot of AI visibility on the table. We run both in parallel inside the same engagement.
AI Optimisation (AIO) is the practice of making your brand and content more likely to be recommended by AI systems like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Gemini when users ask questions related to your industry.
SEO optimises for traditional search engine results pages. AIO optimises for AI-generated answers and recommendations. The ranking factors are different: AI systems prioritise authoritative, well-structured, factual content over keyword density and backlinks.
No one can guarantee specific AI rankings because these systems are constantly evolving. What we can do is systematically improve every factor that influences whether AI systems recommend your brand, and track the results over time.
Initial improvements can appear within 4 to 8 weeks as AI systems re-crawl and process updated content. Sustained ranking improvements typically develop over 3 to 6 months of consistent optimisation.
Yes. SEO and AIO are complementary, not competing. Strong SEO supports AIO because AI systems often reference and cite well-ranked web content. We recommend investing in both.
We optimise across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google Gemini, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, and emerging platforms. Our monitoring covers all major AI systems.
We use proprietary query testing across all major AI platforms, tracking whether your brand is recommended, cited, or mentioned in response to relevant queries. We report on visibility changes monthly.
Absolutely. B2B decision makers increasingly use AI for vendor research and shortlisting. Being recommended by AI during the research phase gives you a significant competitive advantage.
Start with an audit
An AI search specialist replies within one working day with a snapshot of where the major models cite you today, who they cite instead in your category, and what the first ninety days of work would prioritise.